LONDON (Reuters) - In London, the Bank of England said it would allow Britain’s government to run up an unlimited overdraft as the state promises to pay wages to millions of people laid off during shutdown, cut taxes for businesses and expand its welfare system.
With central banks around the world trying to cocoon their their shuttered economies while the shutdowns last, Fed chief Jerome Powell dismissed suggestions they risked creating an inflation surge or distorting the way companies do business.
Unlike the global financial crisis more than a decade ago, when a largely broken banking system brought the world economy to its knees, this time governments were asking entire populations to make what Powell described as “sacrifices for the common good” by staying to try to curb the spread of the virus.
As a result of those social-distancing measures, millions are threatened with unemployment or seeing businesses that were thriving just a few weeks ago pushed to the brink of failure as commerce grinds to a halt.
“We should make them whole. They did not cause this,” Powell said in a webcast hosted by the Brookings Institution. “This is what the great fiscal power of the United States is for, to protect these people from the hardships they are facing.”
In a reminder of the scale of the hit to the U.S. economy, data showed 16.8 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits in the last three weeks.
The Fed, adding to an already extensive set of crisis programs, on Thursday said it would pump up to $500 billion into local governments by buying municipal debt. It also said a new “Main Street” facility will use banks to funnel up to $600 billion in loans to small to medium-sized firms, and it expanded measures to back up corporate debt markets.
Analysts said the Fed seemed willing to buy into any assets that could support the economy as it cast aside some of its traditional caution about risky lending.
Oliver Blackbourn, a portfolio manager at Janus Henderson, said helping companies that choose to take on debt to boost their shareholder returns brought a level of moral hazard in terms of what sort of behaviour a central bank should support.
“It will be interesting to see how the Fed reacts to losses should the coming default cycle take a significant toll on its holdings,” he said.
Powell on Thursday emphasized that, as broad as the central bank’s effort has become, it is meant to be temporary. Once the virus is controlled and recovery under way, “we will put these emergency tools away,” he said.
Other policymakers have maintained the same.
Still, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey has had to counter claims that the British central bank is resorting to direct monetary financing of the government.
The BoE said on Thursday it had agreed to lend to the government temporarily, if needed, to help finance its massive COVID-19 spending plans.
Sensitive to claims it is resorting to monetary financing, or permanently supporting government spending by printing money, the BoE stressed its move was a short-term measure and any money borrowed would be repaid by the end of 2020.
In 2008, the government ran its BoE overdraft up to nearly 20 billion pounds. It may have to go further this time if bond investors balk at a possible doubling of its debt issuance to around 285 billion pounds, according to some forecasts.
The BoE’s move means it is now more directly involved in the government’s finances than the Fed or the European Central Bank
The ECB has moved to target its firepower more towards struggling euro zone countries but is constrained by German opposition to easy money.
Bailey has stressed that monetary financing — linked to hyperinflation in 1920s Germany and later Zimbabwe — remained anathema to central bankers, and the BoE could rein in its stimulus if inflation threatens to take off.
Economists said time would tell whether the BoE’s move represented a practical, temporary step to help the government fund its coronavirus spending splurge, or the end of the era of central bank independence in Britain.
They said the BoE, like many other central banks, were still reliant on massive programmes to buy government debt to reinforce their stimulus plans, despite billing the strategy as an emergency move more than a decade ago.
“Two of the three ingredients of a classic helicopter drop are in place – the government is spending more and the Bank is financing it by creating money,” Paul Dales, an economist with Capital Economics, said.
“It is not yet clear whether the third ingredient – that the increase in central bank money is permanent – is present.”
Additional reporting by David Milliken in London and Balazs Koranyi in Frankfurt; Editing by Cynthia Osterman